Take, for example, the definition of perfect. Webster's has a few:
a) being entirely without fault or defect;
b) satisfying all requirements;
c) corresponding to an ideal standard or abstract concept;
d) faithfully reproducing the original;
e) legally valid
As far as a) goes, I've got a few defects. And I'm rather attached to them. I have a birthmark on my right arm that kids (being kids) tormented me about when I was in grade school. My aunt Muriel told me to tell those kids that a birthmark meant I was kissed by an angel and that pretty much ended that discussion.
When it comes to satisfying requirements (b), I gotta tell ya that John Mellencamp wrote The Authority Song with me in mind. I will meet requirements all day long until I bump up against one that makes no sense. I can only do sense. I'm an ENTJ (Myers-Briggs type) and that's how I'm wired.
If c) could tell me whose ideal I must correspond to, I think I might have something to say about that as well. See b) above.
And d) makes absolutely no sense to me. If it's a reproduction it is therefore not an original and can't possibly be perfect. And who says the original is perfect to begin with?
Legally valid? If it's listed way down at the bottom of the list, I'm thinking it's just asking to be ignored.
Nope. Perfect is not something I want to be. Too restrictive, too dependent on other people's ideas of perfection.
Now "colorful". That's something I could do.